|
|
 |
 |
Nuņez used a charity to funnel donations
Donors with business in Sacramento gave nearly $300,000 to his
events
|
By Nancy
Vogel and Evan Halper
Los Angeles Times
November 2, 2007
SACRAMENTO
Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuņez used a small charity as a
conduit to funnel almost $300,000 from companies and
organizations with business in the Capitol to events that
helped him politically.
By giving to the charity, the donors whom Nuņez solicited
earned tax deductions for which they would not have qualified
had they given directly to Nuņez's campaign accounts. They
were also able to donate more than the $7,200 maximum allowed
under California's campaign fundraising rules.
Those donors include Zenith Insurance Co., AT&T, Verizon
Communications Inc., the California Hospital Assn., the state
prison guards union, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and Blue
Cross of California -- all groups with high stakes in
legislation.
The money was used for events including "Assembly Speaker
Fabian Nuņez's Toy Drive," "Assembly Speaker Fabian
Nuņez's Soccerfest 2006," "Assembly Speaker Fabian
Nuņez's Inaugural Legislative Youth Conference" and
airplane flights for 50 children from Nuņez's district for
"Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuņez's Sacramento Student
Summit," according to state documents.
That arrangement may have violated federal tax laws, according
to experts. The Internal Revenue Service has a strict policy
against charities serving as a pass-through for funds.
In addition, experts say, a plan under which a politician
solicits a donation to a charity and then directs how it can
be used may violate state ethics rules.
"It raises the question of whether these donors are
making a contribution to a charity or simply currying favor
with a politician -- and getting a tax deduction for it,"
said Jack Siegel, a lawyer and accountant who advises
nonprofits nationwide through his Chicago firm, Charity
Governance Consulting.
Records Nuņez filed with the state show that donations to the
charity, Collective Space Inc., ranged from $2,500 to $50,000
in 2005 and 2006. The last year in which the charity served as
a conduit for Nuņez was 2006.
Nuņez directed the donations to the charity, and his staff
told the charity where to spend the money. No mention was made
of the charity in the toy giveaway fliers posted around
Nuņez's downtown district.
Indeed, the charity, based in the MacArthur Park neighborhood
of Los Angeles, was not supposed to be operating at all at the
time. State tax authorities suspended it two years ago --
before the donations -- for failing to file tax returns.
In a telephone interview, Nuņez, a Democrat who represents
parts of Los Angeles, said he did not learn that state
authorities had suspended the charity until The Times asked
about it recently.
He said soliciting donations to Collective Space from those
who also were seeking legislative help in Sacramento was
"absolutely appropriate."
"It's appropriate to request of corporations to be good
corporate citizens, especially if you can put those monies or
resources in the hands of the neediest Californians,
absolutely," he said.
Nuņez insisted that his solicitation of donations was not
intended to benefit himself. But when asked why events
featured his name, he said that "when you're doing good
things like this, nothing wrong with letting people know that
you worked on it or made it happen."
Donors, most of whom had already given money to his campaign
accounts, got nothing in return, Nuņez said, an assertion
echoed by donors interviewed by The Times.
In an e-mail to The Times, Nuņez spokesman Steve Maviglio
said Collective Space "simply served as a conduit for the
funds; the speaker did not raise money for Collective
Space."
But experts say that may be precisely the problem under
federal tax laws.
Charities can, under certain circumstances, lend their
nonprofit status to projects they do not conceive themselves,
but "you are not supposed to be a conduit," said
Gregory Colvin, a San Francisco lawyer specializing in
nonprofit organizations.
The sums requested for Collective Space are part of more than
$484,000 that Nuņez has reported raising for various
nonprofit groups since 2004, according to reports filed with
the Fair Political Practices Commission, which collects
information from lawmakers who solicit charity donations.
Nuņez is not alone in steering large donations to favored
charities. In reports filed in 2006 and so far this year,
Assembly members took credit for nearly $2 million in
donations to such charities as domestic violence shelters and
youth centers, largely given by interests seeking help in the
Capitol.
Few legislators, however, appear to direct how such donations
are spent by the nonprofit organizations, as Nuņez did with
Collective Space. An exception is Assemblyman Lloyd Levine
(D-Van Nuys), who solicited $30,000 from AT&T, Verizon and
the Northridge Hospital and Medical Center to pay for
"Assemblyman Lloyd Levine's Fit & Fun
Challenge," a 5-kilometer event for schoolchildren
organized by Levine's staff.
A 6-year-old nonprofit called the San Fernando Valley
Community Foundation collected the donations and wrote checks
to finance Levine's event.
"It looked like a perfect fit," said foundation
Executive Director Bruce Ackerman. "We're all about
promoting healthy families."
Levine said the nonprofit leaders don't legally have to spend
the money on his event, but they see the value of getting
thousands of children, parents and teachers out to run, walk,
skate and bicycle.
"This is what public service should be about,"
Levine said. "Creating events for the community."
Nuņez began directing donations to Collective Space in 2005,
the year after he became speaker, and continued in 2006,
according to state reports.
Charity Director Evelin Montes said her group was approached
by Nuņez to serve as a "fiscal sponsor" and
cooperated because both were, in many cases, trying to help
the same families.
Founded and incorporated in 2002 by community leaders in Los
Angeles' MacArthur Park and Westlake neighborhoods, the
organization works for improved housing, affordable child care
and other issues. It operates out of a bare-bones storefront
office facing the park. On a recent day, stacks of advice
pamphlets, in Spanish, covered folding tables. The door was
left open for those needing assistance, including a couple
asking for relief from bed bugs.
For its trouble in paying for events arranged by Nuņez's
staff, Montes said, Collective Space took 10% to 15% of the
money solicited by Nuņez. Julia Juarez, a Nuņez staffer who
organized the events, said the nonprofit took "no more
than 10%."
The rest of the money went to the event, Montes said.
"I just cut out the checks to the vendors," she
said. "We did not initiate those projects."
Collective Space has never filed the annual federal tax
returns required of nonprofits that receive more than $25,000
a year in donations, according to state officials. Those
returns, which must also be submitted to the state attorney
general and should be available for public inspection, would
show how much employees are paid and how, in broad terms, the
organization spends the money it collects.
Such returns should have been filed after the California
Endowment Foundation gave the fledgling group $50,000 in 2004.
In February 2005, the California secretary of state suspended
the charity for failing to file certain information, including
a list of officers. In November 2005, the Franchise Tax Board
suspended Collective Space for failure to file federal tax
returns. A month later, the Nuņez-directed donations began to
arrive.
"They are not supposed to be operating," said state
tax board spokeswoman Denise Azimi.
Once a charity's corporate rights and privileges have been
suspended by the state, any contract it enters is subject to
cancellation, according to state law. A charity that failed to
file tax returns could face fines from the IRS of up to
$10,000.
Montes said she is aware that her organization has failed to
meet legal requirements. She said she is working to fill out
the paperwork.
"We will file with the appropriate channels," she
said.
Siegel, the expert on laws governing tax-exempt status,
questioned why the charity failed to file the required
disclosures.
"You have to wonder what is going on here," he said.
"There can't be much of an excuse when you have that kind
of money coming in."
The donors whose money funded Nuņez's endeavors said their
contributions were not meant to influence the speaker on
legislative business.
A spokesman for AT&T, which stands to profit from 2006
Nuņez legislation that opens the cable TV industry to phone
company competition, said it occasionally looks to people like
the speaker for advice on charitable giving.
"AT&T makes contributions to organizations across the
state routinely, many suggested by public officials, business
organizations, community leaders and others," company
spokesman H. Gordon Diamond said in an e-mail. "Our
contributions to Collective Space were simply three of more
than several hundred we made in the Los Angeles area last year
that totaled close to $3 million."
AT&T also been a generous donor to the various campaign
and ballot measure committees for which Nuņez has raised
nearly $11 million since becoming speaker.
Another donor, Zenith Insurance Co., is the state's biggest
private sector workers' compensation carrier. Since the
landmark overhaul of the workers' comp system that Nuņez
helped broker in 2004, insurers, including Zenith, are earning
their fattest profits in three decades.
Stanley Zax, chairman of the board of Zenith Insurance Co.,
gave Collective Space $25,000 in 2005 and another $25,000 the
next year. Nuņez asked him to contribute for a toy drive, he
said.
He said he appreciates philanthropic guidance from politicians
because they often know of small charities.
"I'd rather give to local things where there's not a lot
of overhead involved," Zax said.
nancy.vogel@latimes.com
evan.halper@latimes.com.
Staff writer Molly Hennessy- Fiske contributed to this report.
|
Copyright 1999-2007, California Coastal Coalition
Phone: (760) 944-3564
|
|
|
 |