By Editorial Staff
North County Times
October 4, 2005
Our
view: North County must resist concrete solutions for its
eroding shoreline.
We like sand. We'll take rocks, even. But we don't want any
more concrete on North County's beaches.
The
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' grand plan to save the beaches
and blufftop homes in Solana Beach and Encinitas would, in
essence, take some of the public's beach and give it to the
rich folks living atop the bluffs.
On
one hand, the plan sensibly calls for almost 1.3 million cubic
yards of sand to be dumped on beaches that are vanishing. But
the Army Corps also wants to install concrete plugs to fill
the caves undercutting the base of some sandstone cliffs. This
would actually take away some public beach.
Disappearing beaches in Encinitas and Solana Beach could use
some help. The sand that once replenished them is trapped by
concrete ---- behind dams or beneath the roads, sidewalks and
inland communities we live in. Some is stuck behind jetties
that keep Oceanside Harbor open to boat traffic.
Particularly onerous are the ugly, concrete sea walls that
line many of our bluffs.
Luck, time and the tide have turned on those who have enjoyed
the sunset-stained Pacific horizon from their living rooms.
Their land is slipping from beneath their foundations ---- an
eventuality everyone could see coming, including the blufftop
homeowners and their builders. The rate of erosion may have
sped up in recent decades, but the dynamic is unchanged over
eons: The waves crash into the base of the bluffs, the bluffs
collapse, and the resulting sand provides a brief buffer until
the waves attack again.
Unwilling to give up their homes without a fight, a wealthy
few have armored the cliffs with an assortment of ugly
concrete structures, some camouflaged to mimic the sandstone.
The latest models are so-called erodible concrete plugs to
fill sea caves undercutting the bluffs above.
Each successive concrete solution has the same effect. Try to
walk these cities' western edges at high tide and you had
better bring your bathing suit.
Homes temporarily may be spared, but the beach below is lost
to the rest of North County and its visitors.
Blufftop homeowners have been aided in this gradual transfer
of public land by a California Coastal Act in conflict with
itself. The state's pioneering shoreline protection laws
require the Coastal Commission to both maximize public access
and protect property rights.
But with each sea wall that is approved, erosion is made worse
on the unprotected bluffs at both sides. This vicious cycle
all but forces neighbors to use concrete for protection,
sacrificing yet more future beach.
For vital areas that must be protected, we prefer piles of
rocks to the sheer sea walls; at least rocks look natural.
With the Coastal Commission's backing, Encinitas and Solana
Beach must start condemning untenable homes perched on eroding
cliffs, just as they would any other dangerous home in their
jurisdictions. Of course, the cities also must work to keep
people from laying their towels below the doomed homes, just
as they warn people to stay away from the bluffs themselves.
Unstable cliffs are unsafe by their nature, as is the sea
itself.
Still, we can't let our beaches be lost to fears for public
safety, a high moral ground bluff-top homeowners and their
backers like to claim.
Eventually, as the ocean is allowed to seize the bluffs and
the homes above it, the Coast Highway will be exposed, as is
already the case along Cardiff's Restaurant Row. In any
discussion of coastal retreat, that vital artery is the
state's fallback position. Though it may seem unimaginable
now, local and state planners would be wise to start planning
to move Highway 101 farther inland.
We can't hold back the Pacific's approach without sacrificing
the beaches that many of us consider vital to North County's
appeal. We can either allow the ocean to claim a few rich
folks' homes or we can get used to wading in front of their
towering concrete castle walls.
|
|